Finding Academic Papers for a Research Library

Sep 12, 2026·
Aaron Scherf
Aaron Scherf
· 2 min read
OpenAlex candidates pass through local relevance scoring and owner review, then available full text or a manual-access queue leads to document conversion. Illustration: Paper candidates move through scoring, review, access, and conversion.
blog

Starting a literature review often means finding candidate papers, deciding which ones matter, and tracking down the full text. I built the Journal Discovery Pipeline to help organize those steps and add selected papers to a searchable research library.

The tool starts with a researcher or a topic, then finds candidate papers through OpenAlex, a catalog of academic publications. A model on my computer turns my research description and candidate abstracts into text embeddings: numerical representations used to compare meaning. Comparing those representations gives each candidate a relevance score before any download begins. This scoring stage makes no paid AI calls.

The library can also become a starting point for discovery. The tool follows citations forward to find newer papers that cite work I’ve already collected, scores those candidates, and proposes a reading list. I review that list before anything is downloaded.

For full text, the tool tries several services for freely available copies in turn, so one service missing a paper does not end the search. It can also try my university’s library access where that is available. If those routes fail, the paper goes on a list for me to open through my usual library login. In an early trial, the automatic route obtained 3 of 19 papers; the rest needed a person to retrieve them.

After the papers are available, separate conversion and search tools add their text to the research library. I can then search the papers alongside course materials, with access to more than their abstracts.

Update, October 15, 2026: A later trial searched for papers about disaster resilience, response, and recovery. Fifteen candidates passed the relevance filter, and a review found all fifteen on topic. Seven downloaded automatically; the other eight were left for manual access. That is a useful distinction in practice: finding a relevant paper and obtaining its full text are separate steps.

The project page describes the search sources, results, and remaining work.

Aaron Scherf
Authors
Aaron Scherf (they/them)
PhD Student
I am a PhD student in Sustainable Development at Columbia University and a former USAID Foreign Service Officer. In Ukraine, I led the monitoring and evaluation team for over 50 development projects during the war. Previously, I worked on program design and social inclusion in Colombia, as well as budget analysis and knowledge management in Washington. Those experiences taught me how to ensure evidence is trustworthy and actionable, especially in conditions of rapidly changing and incomplete information. I now bring that perspective to research, data analysis, and practical software tools. I am available part-time for consulting and applied research collaborations.