<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Academic Research |</title><link>https://AaronScherf.github.io/tags/academic-research/</link><atom:link href="https://AaronScherf.github.io/tags/academic-research/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Academic Research</description><generator>HugoBlox Kit (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Finding Academic Papers for a Research Library</title><link>https://AaronScherf.github.io/blog/academic_journal_discovery/</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://AaronScherf.github.io/blog/academic_journal_discovery/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Starting a literature review often means finding candidate papers, deciding which ones matter, and tracking down the full text. I built the
to help organize those steps and add selected papers to a searchable research library.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The tool starts with a researcher or a topic, then finds candidate papers through OpenAlex, a catalog of academic publications. A model on my computer turns my research description and candidate abstracts into text embeddings: numerical representations used to compare meaning. Comparing those representations gives each candidate a relevance score before any download begins. This scoring stage makes no paid AI calls.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The library can also become a starting point for discovery. The tool follows citations forward to find newer papers that cite work I&amp;rsquo;ve already collected, scores those candidates, and proposes a reading list. I review that list before anything is downloaded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For full text, the tool tries several services for freely available copies in turn, so one service missing a paper does not end the search. It can also try my university&amp;rsquo;s library access where that is available. If those routes fail, the paper goes on a list for me to open through my usual library login. In an early trial, the automatic route obtained 3 of 19 papers; the rest needed a person to retrieve them.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After the papers are available, separate conversion and search tools add their text to the research library. I can then search the papers alongside course materials, with access to more than their abstracts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Update, October 15, 2026:&lt;/em&gt; A later trial searched for papers about disaster resilience, response, and recovery. Fifteen candidates passed the relevance filter, and a review found all fifteen on topic. Seven downloaded automatically; the other eight were left for manual access. That is a useful distinction in practice: finding a relevant paper and obtaining its full text are separate steps.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The
describes the search sources, results, and remaining work.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>