<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Education |</title><link>https://AaronScherf.github.io/tags/education/</link><atom:link href="https://AaronScherf.github.io/tags/education/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Education</description><generator>HugoBlox Kit (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>An AI Tutor That Gives Hints and Checks Your Reasoning</title><link>https://AaronScherf.github.io/blog/pedagogical_rag_hints/</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://AaronScherf.github.io/blog/pedagogical_rag_hints/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;An AI assistant can produce a complete solution quickly. That is not always what a student needs. When I am stuck, a useful hint can help me make progress while leaving the reasoning in my hands.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I built the
to support that kind of study. It uses course materials to suggest a direction and can compare a student&amp;rsquo;s reasoning with a reference explanation. For a second check, a separate solver gets the question without the tutor&amp;rsquo;s earlier answer or the source passages used to build it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The hint feature aims to point toward a useful idea without giving away the conclusion. For a claim that is meant to hold in every case, an illustrative hint could be: &amp;ldquo;Try the simplest case you can think of. Which assumption does your argument use?&amp;rdquo; That gives me something to test while leaving the reasoning to me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That fresh view gives the second solver a chance to spot a missing assumption instead of following the same argument. In one recorded coursework trial, it identified a condition about the regression model that the first response had omitted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I share an attempt, the draft check gives separate scores for whether the conclusion is right, whether each step is justified, and whether it uses the course&amp;rsquo;s definitions and methods. A correct result with a gap in the proof needs different feedback from an otherwise sound argument that uses unfamiliar notation. If the source material does not cover a point, the tutor should make that gap clear.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I still have to examine the arguments; agreement between two answers does not settle whether they are right. The
describes the recorded tests, limits, and ongoing development.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>